Blog Layout

Is Your IRA Safe?

August 23, 2015

Michigan law provides some creditor protection to IRAs and other types of retirement accounts such as 401(k) and 403(b) accounts. Under the law, a judgment creditor cannot seize these types of accounts to pay off a debt owed by you. However, the protection offered by this law is limited. The most common type of major creditor for retired persons is a medical creditor, whether a hospital, doctor or nursing home. If you do not have coverage for these types of expenses, or if you exceed the limits of your coverage, the State of Michigan will force you to exhaust or substantially deplete your retirement accounts (including, if married, your spouse’s account) by denying Medicaid coverage until the account is spent down. The other major threat to retirement accounts occurs upon death. When children inherit an IRA, that inherited IRA is no longer entitled to the protections that you had during your lifetime, according to a recent Supreme Court decision. Therefore, if your child is having creditor problems or going through a divorce at the time of your death, or after your death, the inherited IRA is subject to seizure by the child’s creditor.

Protecting Retirement Accounts With Trusts


You can enhance the protection accorded your retirement account by providing for the account to be left to a spouse or children in trust. In the case of a spouse, an IRA left to a properly designed testamentary trust is considered an exempt asset by Medicaid. In contrast, an IRA that is simply rolled over by a surviving spouse is fully available to nursing homes and other medical creditors.

In the case of children, if a retirement account is lift to a properly designed trust, the account will receive protection from creditors, including ex-spouses. The protection that is available is greater if you arrange for a third party to be trustee of the trust. However, even if you desire the child to be trustee of his or her own trust, the protections available under the law are much greater than leaving the retirement account to the child outright.

What about taxes?


Many financial advisors tell their clients not to leave their retirement accounts to a trust because they have heard that there are adverse tax consequences to doing so. In particular, retirement accounts left to a poorly designed trust will be required to parcel out distributions to the beneficiary over a much shorter time period. This can increase income taxes by bunching retirement account income into a few short years. However, a well-designed trust allows an heir to stretch distributions over his or her life expectancy just as if you left it to him or her outright.

The other potential tax problem with leaving a retirement account to a trust for a beneficiary is that trusts have compressed income tax brackets. This means the trust will reach the highest income tax bracket with much lower income than an individual. However, a trust receives a deduction for distributions to its beneficiary. Therefore, when a trust receives the minimum required distribution from the retirement account each year, if there are no current creditor problems, the trustee can pass the distribution on to the beneficiary and the tax treatment will be the same as if the distribution came directly to the individual beneficiary. If there are current creditor problems (ie., spouse is in a nursing home or child is getting a divorce) the trustee can hold on to the distribution and pay the additional taxes. The additional taxes are a small price to pay to avoid losing the entire distribution to the nursing home or other creditor.

Trusts Attorney near Muskegon, MI
Elder Lawyer in Coopersville, MI
February 26, 2025
If you're in Coopersville MI, an elder lawyer can help you protect your assets, navigate complex legal matters, and ensure your healthcare wishes are honored. Contact David Waterstradt today to schedule a consultation.
Elder Lawyer in Coopersville, MI
November 21, 2023
Elder law attorneys provide legal services for seniors. Discover the specific services you can get from a qualified elder law attorney.
Experienced Tax Planning Attorney near Muskegon, MI
February 17, 2021
Tax Planning The goal of year-end tax planning is usually to defer income into the next year and gain deductions in the current year. This may be reversed this year as it is anticipated that President Biden will raise taxes and, therefore, taxpayers may want to accelerate income into the current year and defer deductions to next year. However, many speculate that President Biden’s proposals for tax increases on high earners are unlikely to be addressed until at least 2022.
Certified elder law attorney in Muskegon, MI
February 17, 2021
Managing the care needs of an aging parent can be a daunting task. When it becomes clear that an older adult can no longer care for themselves safely in their home, there are many options to consider such as the quality of their care, their safety, and the cost (including when and how Medicaid and/or Veterans benefits might become available). These considerations become confusing when faced with last minute decision making, marketing campaigns and promises of salespeople who are under pressure to fill rooms. Most people are even confused by the different options available and sometimes the wrong placement decision for a loved one can be disastrous.
Special needs trust attorney near Muskegon, MI
January 10, 2019
On December 7, 2016, the U.S. Senate passed the Special Needs Trust Fairness Act. This Act makes it possible for a disabled adult who is mentally competent to establish his or her own special needs trust if they acquire assets that will put them over the asset limit for programs such as Medicaid or SSI. It corrects the false presumption in prior law that all disabled persons lack the mental capacity to handle their own legal and financial affairs.
Professional Trusts Attorney near Muskegon, MI
January 4, 2018
December 2017 Newsletter Article
Professional Estate Planning Attorney near Muskegon, MI
March 8, 2017
The IRS, State of Michigan and Veterans Administration have completed their annual adjustments to important thresholds in the estate planning and elder law world. Here is a quick reference guide to the current numbers.
Professional Trust Attorney near Muskegon, MI
December 9, 2016
On December 7, 2016, the U.S. Senate passed the Special Needs Trust Fairness Act. President Obama reportedly intends to sign it. This Act makes it possible for a disabled adult who is mentally competent to establish his or her own special needs trust if they acquire assets that will put them over the asset limit for programs such as Medicaid or SSI. It corrects the false presumption in prior law that all disabled persons lack the mental capacity to handle their own legal and financial affairs. Under prior law, only a parent, grandparent, court appointed guardian or a court itself could establish the type of special needs trust that allows a disabled individual to benefit from their assets for their supplemental needs while maintaining eligibility for Medicaid and SSI (also known as a (d)(4)(A) trust, after the enabling legislation).
Medicaid planning lawyer near Muskegon, MI
August 4, 2016
Did you know it’s not necessary to spend down assets on unnecessary items when trying to qualify a loved one for Medicaid for nursing home related expenses? Medicaid’s asset limit is $2,000 for an individual. Many people will go on a spending spree and purchase unnecessary items to use up assets above the $2,000 limit in an attempt to qualify for Medicaid. However, rather than spending money unnecessarily, it is possible to set aside half or more of a loved one assets over $2,000 for future needs if this is done within Medicaid gifting rules. Medicaid will impose a disqualification period if assets are transferred. Nonetheless, assets can still be transferred if sufficient assets are converted to income to make sure the nursing home gets paid during the disqualification period. A skilled elder law attorney can guide you through these rules.
Elder attorney near Muskegon, MI
June 8, 2016
The Michigan Supreme Court recently declined to review the decision of the Michigan Court of Appeals in Estate of Margaret Marie Roush v. Laurel’s of Carson City . Ms. Roush was a patient at the Laurel’s of Carson City, a skilled nursing facility. Ms. Roush had nominated a patient advocate, and on October 24, 2012, that nominated patient advocate agreed that Ms. Roush should remain in the facility care. However, a dispute arose as to whether two doctors had certified that Ms. Roush was unable to make her own decisions, a condition necessary for the patient advocate to have any decision making authority.
More Posts
Share by: